یکشنبه، دی ۰۷، ۱۳۹۹

freedom being about firing

Take 1:
freedom means freedom to fire. 
Take 2:
Freedome is about being able to fire. 
Take 3:
You are free as much you can fire. 
Take 4:
All Freedome is eventually freedom to fire someone, or anyone. (Not to be trapped in them).
Take 5:
One aspect of every freedomeis to kee having the Freedome to leave it and fire them.
No one has authority on you or owns you, you are in a contract with them, which you can resign/cancel any time.

You can fire the person in power, the company that hires you,..... 
Allof these people are your clients, or you are their client. 
You need to be able to switch. That's one reason money is useful. You can select another option instead and pay for that. Not obliged to choose something.
It's choice.
It is transferable and replaceable. 

Fire your boss: your boss. in fact you are the client and you can choose another server (another plumber) .
You are a boss and you can hire another client, and fire them.
The former is often considered as freedom. But the latter is the more interesting point here. 

Evolution and survival. This has to do with an abstraction about these. 

Take 6:
There are multiple types of fredom: takes, paradigms, etc. 

Take 7:
Who is the client? It only depends on the point of view and point of narration. A contract can be seen in both ways. 

It is their survival. 

Your choice of president cannot be changed too rapidly though. It is rate limited. 

This is in contrast with the view of cardinality of the set of degrees of freedom. But in fa t there is a mirror meta symmetry. Each view is asymmetric, but a mirror image also exists. 

Take 9:
Tjayshow history progresses. 

(In history, the meaning of x progresses). 
x = freedom. 
x = mode of persuasion.

Persuation moments:
* Force
* Bully
* Make that person self sabotage. Make them bully themselves. 
* Mislead or lead or influence (sophistis) 
* Persuage: logically, self-contradiction (Sxratic). 
* Persuade: talk-therapy.
* Debate
* Label, induce polarity, otherness: use the sense of enemy. (bipartite model of the world). 
* Sell the vision
* Make them do volunteer work (freely, not because of market /economy). 
* Make them work cheaply (K.) 
* Oensourve or wiki cobtrubution
* Collaboration or mind storming. 
* Contract. Various forms of contracts. (Nautical...). 
... 

* Lamguage
* Language charged with harsh lamguagw
* Language charged with various labels and symbolics
* Language and ethics (super ego) 
... 

etc.
More on this. 

دوشنبه، آذر ۲۴، ۱۳۹۹

سیستم قضایی پایه تمدن است. اگر سیستم قضایی نداشته باشیم، ماقبل تمدن خواهیم بود. 

چهارشنبه، آذر ۱۹، ۱۳۹۹

Analysis as Comparison

 

Analysis is all about "Comparisons". 

(This is a free flowing note)

It is also about dissection. (or breaking into parts or constituents).

Buulding up an argument in which the output is by comparison (hence, output of a binary "decision" about something objective ) or a series of comparisons.
The result is binary, hence, "logic". 
Any "decision" is eventually a comparison. It is analysis when decision is part of a mental process (without acting), results in an intellectual predicate, that is descriptive. Doing analysis used the same faculties of decision making. But about past, not future (prediction) of outcomes. But it always involved counterfactual, so the outcome, as a mental product, implies some generative model that will produce decisions.

Decision about somebeing. Not a Decision to "do" something.

I am not trying to define analysis, but want to emphasise the essence of analysis is where it culminated to comparisons, implicit or explicit. 

A report of a mental process in which the main tools are:
* Comparison
* Cutting.

جمعه، آذر ۱۴، ۱۳۹۹

رابطه ‏ی ‏ذهنیت ‏قربانی ‏و ‏سیستم ‏قضایی

علت ریشه ای خود مظلوم پنداری (به عنوان مکانیزم دفاعی و سازگاری)، نبودن سیستم قضایی مرجع است. افراد مجبور می‌شوند خودشان حقشان را بگیرند. و مکانیزم های غریزی مثل مظلومیت، انتقام، کینه (و انواع خشونت)،و غیره فعال می‌شود. این غرایز، اتفاقا لازمه ی بقا در جامعه ای هستند که در اون، بستر تمدن، یعنی یک سیستم قضایی مستقل و بالاتر از قدرت، غایب یا ناکارآمد است. سیستم قضایی ای که باید مامور برون‌سپاری خشونت و مرجع جایگزین غریزه های فوق الذکر باشد. مشروطه خواهان هم اشتباه شون این بود که کم کم خواسته ی اصلی یعنی عدالتخانه را فراموش کردند. و سرشان به خواسته دیگر یعنی مجلس گرم شد. در حالیکه مجلس، نسبت به عدالتخانه، فرع است.